The Germans Decimated the Russian Second Army in Just Four Days at the Battle of Tannenberg

Photo Credits: 'Tannenberg, Hindenburg auf Schlachtfeld' by Hugo Vogel / German Federal Archives Bild 103-121-018 / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain.

Five hundred years before World War I, the Teutonic Knights faced a devastating defeat at the Battle of Tannenberg (also known as Grunwald) at the hands of Slavic and Lithuanian forces. By 1914, however, the Germans had inflicted a decisive defeat on the Russian Second Army in just four days, strikingly close to the site of that 1410 engagement.

Capitalizing on this historical connection, German leaders chose to name the site of their significant victory “Tannenberg.”

Early days of World War I

Belgian artillery captured by the Germans during the Battle of Liège, 1914. (Photo Credit: Underwood Archives / Getty Images)

Germany initiated its involvement in the Great War through the execution of the Schlieffen Plan, shaped by the insights of Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen. This grand design envisioned a sweeping German invasion of France and Belgium, rallying the support of Germany’s allies before advancing into France via the Netherlands.

The primary objective was to defeat the French Third Republic. Simultaneously, a smaller German force would head eastward to confront potential threats from Russia until reinforcements could join them. The German Army, boasting a total strength of 1,191 battalions in 1914, allocated the majority of its forces to the Western Front for the campaign in France, while the Eighth Army of East Prussia, constituting only 10 percent of Germany’s military might, directed its attention toward the Eastern Front.

Concurrently, France swiftly mobilized its forces, launching an immediate counteroffensive to repel the advancing Germans. Neutral Belgium, after two weeks of fighting in the Battle of Liège – the inaugural official battle of WWI – succumbed to the German onslaught, providing a strategic corridor for their invasion.

Anticipating support from the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) and their Russian allies, France recognized the time required for Russia to fully mobilize. Hindered by a limited and predominantly single-tracked railway network (75 percent of Russian railways fell into this category), it took a considerable 60 days for sufficient divisions to be actively engaged in the conflict.

Battle of Gumbinnen

Eighth Army staff, 1914. (Photo Credit: Hogo Vogel / Sammelbild der Immalin-Werke / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Eighth Army was the least experienced unit in the Imperial German military, composed of reservists and garrison troops, and led by Generaloberst Maximilian von Prittwitz. He was surprised by the pace at which the Russians had mobilized, faster than he had anticipated.

It quickly became apparent that the Russians had outflanked them by deploying two armies to invade East Prussia. In response, Germany directed von Prittwitz to engage the Russian 1st Army Corps at the Battle of Gumbinnen on August 20, 1914. Both sides incurred heavy losses, and with a second Russian force advancing, von Prittwitz considered a retreat. However, German officials insisted surrender wasn’t an option.

As a result, von Prittwitz was replaced by two distinguished military leaders: General der Infanterie Erich Ludendorff and Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg, who took command of the Imperial German Army on the Eastern Front. Under this leadership, the Eighth Army prepared to fight the unprepared Russians with every advantage at their disposal.

Was Russia doomed from the start?

German soldiers fighting the Russian Army during the Battle of Tannenberg, 1914. (Photo Credit: Hulton Archive / Getty Images)

The events that unfolded prior to the Battle of Tannenberg likely sealed Russia’s fate before any fighting even began. The inexperienced Russian Army made a critical error with its radio communications. Orders were transmitted over open radio frequencies, and although they were encoded, the Germans easily intercepted and exploited these communications.

The National Security Agency (NSA) highlights that the Battle of Tannenberg marked the first time in history that the interception of enemy radio communications had a decisive effect.

Related Post

One intercepted message revealed that the 1st Army Corps was not advancing towards the Eighth Army as expected but was instead moving north towards Königsberg, Prussia, with the Second Army following closely behind. The two armies were separated by the 50-mile stretch of the Masurian Lake District, which obstructed their progress towards Königsberg.

Surrounding the Second Army

Captured Russian soldiers following the Battle of Tannenberg. (Photo Credit: Universal History Archive / Universal Images Group / Getty Images).

Using the intercepted radio messages, Ludendorff, a military theorist, came up with a strategy to attack the 2nd Army south of the Masurian Lakes. The 2nd’s commander, General of the Cavalry Alexander Samsonov, was already hindered by a slow supply chain, poor communication and the difficulty of navigating a large force with heavy artillery through the are’s impossible terrain. Soon, he and his men found themselves completely surrounded by the Germans.

“Imagine this Russian army as a bulge pressing into Germany and the Germans strike at a point where the bulge begins and cut off the vast majority of the Russian forces in the middle,” explains military historian, Jay Lockenour. “Because of communication problems, the Russian commanders didn’t know that a major attack on their flank was underway until half a day too late.”

Samsonov’s men were spread out over a 60-mile stretch, with the center, right and left wings separated – practically inviting the Germans to attack both wings. Meanwhile, the 1st Army Corps, led by General of the Cavalry Paul von Rennenkampf, was in no rush to come to the 2nd’s aid. Instead, a lapse in communication failed to urge him to pick up the pace and change his focus from Königsberg to the Masurian Lakes.

On August 26, 1914, Ludendorff ordered General der Infanterie Hermann von François and his I Corps to attack and break through the Russians’ left wing.

Who won the Battle of Tannenberg?

Russian prisoners of war (POWs) being led to Berlin following the Battle of Tannenberg, 1914. (Photo Credit: Paul Thompson / FPG / Getty Images)

The height of the Battle of Tannenberg occurred on August 27, with the German heavy fire focused on the left wing. Soon, Russian troops began to flee across the frontier, toward Neidenburg, and von François ordered his men to hold the road from there to Willenberg.

They formed a barricade across the line of retreat as Russian soldiers flowed in and out of the nearby woods. The Germans secured the rear group, who were exhausted from lack of rest and food. The hungry and exhausted men accepted their defeat, surrendering to the Germans in the tens of thousands.

Even Samsonov found himself wrapped up in the flurry of retreating men. Unable to stop the madness, he turned around and rode south, only to get lost in the dense forest. His absence had gone unnoticed until the early hours of August 30, when a lone shot rang out from the woods. Rather than admit to his failure, Samsonov shot himself with his officer’s pistol.

Even though the German contingent of 150,000 men was outnumbered by the Russians, who had 230,000, they still managed to nearly eradicate the entire 2nd Army. When all was said and done, only 10,000 returned to Russia. Between 30,000-78,000 were killed or wounded in the battle, while another 92,000 were taken as prisoners of war (POWs).

Want War History Online‘s content sent directly to your inbox? Sign up for our newsletter here!

Battles continued between the Germans and the Russian 1st Army Corps, who were also defeated and mostly destroyed. After the resounding success of the campaign, German Kaiser Wilhelm II named the battle after Tannenberg, a nod to the 1410 engagement that eviscerated German knights.

Elisabeth Edwards: Elisabeth Edwards is a public historian and history content writer. After completing her Master's in Public History at Western University in Ontario, Canada Elisabeth has shared her passion for history as a researcher, interpreter, and volunteer at local heritage organizations. She also helps make history fun and accessible with her podcast The Digital Dust Podcast, which covers topics on everything from art history to grad school. In her spare time, you can find her camping, hiking, and exploring new places. Elisabeth is especially thrilled to share a love of history with readers who enjoy learning something new every day! The Digital Dust Podcast
Leave a Comment