The Remarkably Effective PIAT Was the British Army’s Response to German Tank Armor

Photo Credit: FPG / Archive Photos / Getty Images

By 1942, the Second World War had persisted for three years. The British had encountered significant combat across different theaters, frequently facing off against the Germans and their tanks. Although their infantry were well-armed with a variety of anti-tank weapons, they weren’t inflicting the necessary damage.

Initially, the British relied on the Boys anti-tank rifle and the Grenade, Rifle No. 68 / Anti-Tank (AT) as their main anti-tank armaments, but soon realized neither was sufficiently effective. In fact, during the British Eighth Army’s assessment of Operation Crusader in North Africa, they couldn’t find a single recorded instance where the Boys rifle successfully disabled a German tank.

Recognizing this weakness, the British understood the need to develop a new weapon to serve as their primary anti-tank gun. This led to the creation of the Projector, Infantry, Anti-Tank Mk 1, more commonly known as the PIAT.

Initial development and design of the PIAT

Among the two British weapons most frequently deployed against tanks in the early stages of the war, the Boys anti-tank rifle was considered the best choice. It was a strong rifle capable of piercing 25 mm of tank armor from a distance of half a kilometer. Nonetheless, its deployment in France soon revealed its inability to match the increasingly heavier enemy tank armor.

Workers assemble PIAT parts in Orilla, Ontario, Canada, June 1944. (Photo Credit: Page Toles / National Film Board of Canada / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The predecessor to the PIAT was initially designed as a spigot mortar intended for the British Home Guard to use in the event of a German invasion. The design came from Lt. Col. Stewart Blacker of the Royal Artillery and underwent numerous changes and rejections by the War Office before resulting in the Blacker Bombard. Upon learning about shaped charges, he adjusted the weapon to develop the Baby Bombard.

Innovative ammunition created the PIAT

The improvement of the design was eventually handed over to Maj. Millis Jefferis, a sapper with the British Army and the commander of Ministry of Defence 1 (MD1), the secret British weapon development facility nicknamed “Churchill’s Toyshop.” Jefferis rebuilt the prototype to create what would become the PIAT.

Production began in August 1942 and the weapon was in use the following year.

Soldier with the 5th Duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry, 43rd (Wessex) Division carrying a PIAT, November 18, 1944. (Photo Credit: Sargent Carpenter / No 5 Army Film & Photographic Unit / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

What’s interesting about the PIAT is that the charge moved extremely slowly – only 83 meters per second – as the weapon fired a hollow cone-shaped charge launched by a jet of molten metal. This meant the range and velocity had no impact on performance. The energy from the explosion was concentrated in the point of the charge, allowing it to easily pierce through a tank, despite its slow speed.

Working with a stiff spring

While the weapon was considered very effective, it had a few drawbacks. The primary difficulty soldiers faced with the PIAT was that the compressed spring used to load it was extremely stiff and hard to manage, yet the process had to be done manually before the first shot was fired.

Related Post

It was designed, however, so the recoil from that first shot would re-charge the PIAT, meaning the user wouldn’t have to. This didn’t always happen, as there was a lapse between the trigger pull and the round ejection. This often led to those who were inexperienced releasing their grip too early, causing the weapon to not re-charge. It wasn’t a matter of simply re-charging the gun either, as this was difficult to do without standing up.

Fusilier F. Jefferson of C Company, 2nd Lancashire Fusiliers in front of a German Sturmgeschütz (StuG) III assault gun, which he’d knocked out with a PIAT, May 1944. (Photo Credit: Sargent Menzies / No 2 Army Film & Photographic Unit / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Due to the issues with the stiff spring, soldiers were trained to keep the PIAT charged before expected use and to always have it charged, but unloaded, when in action. Only when it didn’t automatically re-charge on the recoil did the user actually re-charge during combat.

Other issues with the PIAT

While the stiff spring used for charging the weapon was its primary design flaw, the PIAT had other issues, as well. The weapon itself and its ammunition were very heavy, with the latter alone weighing between 14.4 and 15 kg. While it could be operated by one person, it generally wasn’t, with a second typically carrying and loading the ammunition.

PIAT in action at a firing range in Tunisia, February 19, 1943. (Photo Credit: Sargent Loughlin / No 2 Army Film & Photographic Unit / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

One of the other main issues was that the PIAT had an exceedingly forceful kickback. One British soldier who used the weapon in Italy shot at a German Panther tank while standing with it on his shoulder. Although he succeeded in his shot, the recoil was so strong that he was completed knocked over.

Many soldiers wholeheartedly believed the recoil could break one’s shoulder.

Notable use during the Second World War

The PIAT was used by the British and other Commonwealth forces during the final years of the Second World War. It was first introduced during the Tunisia Campaign and was later used in the battles of Normandy, Arnhem, Ortona and Villers-Bocage, as well as during operations Epsom and Perch. Polish resistance fighters also used it during the Warsaw Uprising.

Soldiers with Battalion Czata 49, in Wola district, inspect their PIATs. (Photo Credit: Unknown Author / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

More from us: The M320 Grenade Launcher is a Serious Step-Up From the M203

By the end of the war, there were roughly six Victoria Crosses awarded for PIAT-related actions, along with many other medals. Among the recipients were Maj. Robert Cain, who destroyed several German vehicles in Oosterbeek; Pvt. Ernest “Smokey” Smith, who knocked out a Panther tank; and Rifleman Ganju Lama, who single-handedly defeated several Japanese tanks during the Battle of Imphal.

Rosemary Giles: Rosemary Giles is a history content writer with Hive Media. She received both her bachelor of arts degree in history, and her master of arts degree in history from Western University. Her research focused on military, environmental, and Canadian history with a specific focus on the Second World War. As a student, she worked in a variety of research positions, including as an archivist. She also worked as a teaching assistant in the History Department. Since completing her degrees, she has decided to take a step back from academia to focus her career on writing and sharing history in a more accessible way. With a passion for historical learning and historical education, her writing interests include social history, and war history, especially researching obscure facts about the Second World War. In her spare time, Rosemary enjoys spending time with her partner, her cats, and her horse, or sitting down to read a good book.
Leave a Comment